Evidence & regulatory context
- Mechanism
- Implanted device; no ChEMBL entity. ClinicalTrials.gov search for implanted direct-current field stimulation returned no trial of this intervention (only an unrelated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation study).
- Target
- Not recorded
- Injury models
- Spinal cord injury
- Reported indication
- Not recorded
- First approval
- Not recorded
- Development stage
- Not recorded
- ChEMBL record
- Not recorded
- ChEMBL max phase
- Not recorded
- Synonyms
- Not recorded
- Note
- Not recorded
Clinical trials 0
0 linked trials carry an injury-indication flag. These flags support record-level exploration and sit alongside the stringent aggregate counts described in Methods.
No linked human trial in this dataset.
Preclinical evidence 1
1 studies reported at therapy level; 1 evidence entries itemised.
RatSpinal cord injuryCompressionInbred strain not specifiedn = 40 rats in total, four groups of 10Implanted device applying a direct-current field to the injured cord14 microA treatment stimulator versus 0 microA control stim…Implanted after acute spinal cord injury
Model: Clip compression injury of the spinal cord at C7-T1 at two severities (17 g and 53 g clip force)
In the milder 17 g injury there were no significant differences between treated and control rats. In the severe 53 g injury, direct-current stimulation improved inclined-plane scores, motor evoked potential amplitude and the number of labelled cells in the red nucleus, raphe nuclei and vestibular n…
Extraction: extract · Subtype source: rule · Supplied extraction confidence: 0.9. Machine-extracted fields require source verification.