Extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs low-level laser therapy vs pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in knee osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Enrolment: 120 · Results not recorded
Procedure
0 linked trials carry an injury-indication flag. These flags support record-level exploration and sit alongside the stringent aggregate counts described in Methods.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Enrolment: 120 · Results not recorded
Healthy
Enrolment: 7 · Results not recorded
Graft Shrinkage · Gingival Recession
Enrolment: 48 · Results not recorded
Canine Retraction · Root Resorption
Enrolment: 20 · Results not recorded
Adhesive Capsulitis
Enrolment: 65 · Results not recorded
Chemotherapy-induced Alopecia
Enrolment: 72 · Results not recorded
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy · Type 2 Diabetes
Enrolment: 36 · Results not recorded
1 studies reported at therapy level; 1 evidence entries itemised.
Model: 8 mm full-thickness excisional dorsal skin wound in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats (streptozotocin 60 mg/kg intraperitoneally)
Both laser regimens accelerated wound closure by approximately 40% during the first three days compared with untreated controls, increased acute inflammatory infiltrate up to day 3, and produced more myofibroblasts and better organised collagen. Single 4 J/cm2 and four 1 J/cm2 applications gave sim…
Extraction: extract · Supplied extraction confidence: 0.9. Machine-extracted fields require source verification.