Comparative Analysis of Cost-effectiveness of Silver Dressing in Burns (nanocrystalline silver vs silver sulfadiazine)
Second-degree Burn
Enrolment: 100 · Results not recorded
Device
2 linked trials carry an injury-indication flag. These flags support record-level exploration and sit alongside the stringent aggregate counts described in Methods.
Second-degree Burn
Enrolment: 100 · Results not recorded
Wounds and Injuries · Burns · Pressure Ulcer · Foot Ulcer
Enrolment: 25 · Results not recorded
Diabetic Foot
Enrolment: 31 · Results not recorded
Venous Leg Ulcer
Enrolment: 31 · Results not recorded
Gingival Pigmentation
Enrolment: 12 · Results not recorded
1 studies reported at therapy level; 1 evidence entries itemised.
Model: Deep second-degree dorsal skin burn produced by a standard method under anaesthesia
Serum silver rose significantly above the reference level with both dressings. Hepatotoxicity was greater with AgiCoat than Acticoat, no pathological change was seen in other organs, and wound healing was faster with Acticoat.
Extraction: extract · Supplied extraction confidence: 0.8. Machine-extracted fields require source verification.