PebbleAtlas
PEBBLE / ATLAS
Open research access
PRECLINICAL PUBLICATION · 2018

A Comparison Between Two Collagen Nerve Conduits and Nerve Autograft: A Rat Model of Motor Nerve Regeneration.

Rat / Other

Evidence by therapy association

Study details and outcomes are extracted in the context of a specific intervention. Separate associations are retained rather than silently merged.

PMID 30502013 ↗2018Mixed findings

A Comparison Between Two Collagen Nerve Conduits and Nerve Autograft: A Rat Model of Motor Nerve Regeneration.

RatOtherSprague-DawleyMalen = 72 rats randomised into 3 groupsSurgical implantation across the 10 mm nerve gapAt the time of nerve transection

Model: Unilateral 10 mm sciatic nerve defect (acute transection injury) repaired at the time of injury

Autograft outperformed both conduits, and the hollow collagen conduit gave better recovery than the polyglycolic acid collagen-filled conduit, with differences in contractile force significant only at 12 weeks.

Extraction: extract · Supplied extraction confidence: 0.6. Machine-extracted fields require source verification.